Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unlawfully killed transgender people

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 00:25, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of unlawfully killed transgender people (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The list fails because there are very few indications in the article of these deaths occurring because the victims were transgender. An article covering the death of transgender people generally could be written in the style of Migrant deaths along the Mexico–United States border, but as it stands, this list hints at a causal relationship, without coming right out and saying so. StAnselm (talk) 19:12, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 20:11, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Rab V (talk) 00:22, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
But which ones are hat crimes? All of them? In this case, why isn't that the subject of the article? StAnselm (talk) 08:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I don't see the article implying that the deaths are directly caused by them being trans, but it lists a source in the beginning indicating that being trans and getting murdered are pretty correlated. Either way, your criticism sounds like something that could be dealt with by editing the page in some way. In that case this isn't a reason to delete this page, but I do agree it could use more editing to be more in the style of the list you posted. Like it says in the deletion policy, "If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." Rab V (talk) 05:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
But which entries do I remove? All the ones that don't explicitly call the killing a hate crime? StAnselm (talk) 08:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds like a discussion for the talk page, not AFD. But as the article isn't explicitly only about hate crimes, and the definition of a hate crime can depend on locale, I'd argue that would be a poor criteria. As the article is written now, I don't see a need to only include hate crimes as well since it isn't arguing that being trans directly causes higher murder rates. It only discusses correlation not causation. There are research articles that discuss reasons besides direct causation that could put transgender people at higher risks for violence, like this. That could be used to further clarify things. Rab V (talk) 08:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.